Ontology

The Ontological argument would be that by the use of movement and intuition, if objet dart can trust of or retrieve theology, then God must exist. The teleological argument would be that there is hold upon evidence that everything in nature has a suggest or reason for cosmos. This being true, then God has to exist by reason that God created all of this and gave it purpose. The cosmogonic argument would be that everything is created with for a reason and the God gave everything that reason. I think cosmological and Teleological arguments argon similar in this way of thinking.The philosopher I believe make the strongest impact on me would be Leibniz and the cosmogonical argument. Our lives and existence on this planet our so complicated, yet everything seems to fit together and come a purpose. I know that things exit in the world and we wonder what purpose did that serve, why did that have to happen. In the end, if we unfeignedly look at the regular(a)t objectively and wi th aside emotion, we can find the reason. I think of on the dot matchless thing, the human body, and I have to marvel in its human body. How could mortal come up with the idea and design which allows our bodies to function?We are, in essence a perpetual motion machine. Our systems are more complicated then any opposite piece of machinery out there and even with all of our advancements in computers, non one can compete with the human brain. They are amazing, yet they are only as smart as the person who programmed it. Yes, almost of them are able to learn however this is only because the programmer has taught them to do so. This is just one aspect of life. You do non have to believe in God per say, but you can not go outside and look around you and not believe that there has to be something out there.