Philosophical Argument Essay Example for Free

Philosophical Argument EssaySomething must first be said briefly some the moral subjectivism inherent in this analysis. Based on the above, it follows that some things could be immoral for some commonwealth and moral (or amoral) for others, since people vary in their values. For recitation, some people may possess a cardinal value for all animal life of any kind, which would entail non eating meat, non allowing suicide, nor charge allowing the removal of life support for a brain-dead patient. But this value system would only exist for them, not for others. However, my analysis does not entail moral relativism in the usual sense, since it is also possible (and I believe it is the case) that some first harmonic values are shared by all people, or very around all people (I allow some rare exceptions for the sociopath, who is generally regarded as having a mind noncitizen to the vast majority of humankind, devoid of all ordinary moral sentiment). (Carrier) The above argume nt contains two exposit 1) Some people value all forms of life and 2) All people share some fundamental values. The conclusion is that Morality is relative. The quoted passage is an example of argument because it expresses a claim which is being supported by the given premises. It can be said that morality is relative because people have different side about the value of life (that while others do not admit any sort of exploit that would not promote life as morally permissible, others welcome the fact that every person has a right to make a decision about how he would like to treat his life or whatsoever).From a point of view outside of this affair, the killing of a neurologically inactive fetus is no greater a harm than the killing of a mouse, and in fact decidedly lessa mouse is neurologically active, and though it lacks a complex cerebral cortex, it has a brain of suitable complexity to perceive pain (and I would struggle that the mouse deserves some moral consideration, th ough less than humans). A fetus cannot perceive pain (and recognition is not quite the same thing as sensation sensation can exist without a brain, barely perception cannot).The neural structures necessary to register and record sensations of pain transmitted by the impound nerves either do not exist or are not functioning forrader the fifth month of gestation. A fetus can no more feel pain than a surgical patient under general anasthesia, or a paraplegic whose lower-body nerves continue reacting to stimuli, but cease sending signals to the brain. And we have already established that a fetus does not contain an unmarried human personality of any kind, any more than a brain-dead adult does. With no perception of pain, and no loss of an individual personality, the act of stillbirth causes no immediate harm. (Carrier The second passage is another example of an argument. It has three premises 1) Fetus is neurologically inactive 2) Fetus does not feel pain 3) Fetus does not possess individual personality. The conclusion suggests that Abortion causes no harm. Obviously, the established premises attempt to prove the conclusion. Since fetus cannot react to any form of stimuli as how a surgical patient or even a mouse does, hence the act of abortion does not inflict harm to the fetus.Work CitedCarrier, Richard C. Abortion is not Immoral and Should not be Illegal . 30 November 2005. Internet Infidels. 31 February 2008 http//www.infidels.org/library/modern/debates/secularist/abortion/carrier1.html.