Act Three Scene Three of Journeys End by RC Sheriff Essay examples --

Act triple Scene Three of Journeys EndJourneys end, written in 1918, is a short play furbish up in the trenches ofWorld War One. The English trench is opposite a German trench withonly sixty or so yards of no mans land amongst them. The play triesto show the reality of war through intellects or comradeship and the waythat the characters interact under pressure of e preciseday life in thetrenches. The play overly displays ideas of heroism through respect forother soldiers or characters. Overall it is the disgust of war itselfthat is conveyed in this play, shown mainly through expiry and thelifestyle that had to be lead.Act three Scene three is the very last scene of the play. From almostthe very beginning we have know that an attack from the German armyis to be expected. However, the characters in the play argon not surewhen it exit take place or in what form. As the attack could transpireat any given endorsement the tension is high throughout the play.This is not the only anx iety in the script at the beginning of Actthree Scene three. capital of North Carolina and Stanhope, the plays two most prominentcharacters, have had a large blood line about the death of a mutualfriend, which they do not get back before the beginning of this scene.The strain between these two characters has been immense for the term of the play. They were previously well acquainted butStanhope feared that Raleigh, a recent atom to the company, wouldthink badly of him as he has become an alcoholic, and thereforerefuses to love him as a friend, but incisively a colleague. Raleighhas anchor this very hard to accept.The audience is not only expecting the attack, but also for Stanhopeand Raleigh to clear the air once and for all so they basis re... ...is about workingsuccessfully with others in one big machine. If the move of thatmachine do not work together then it will break down. He also wantedto portray the absolute horror and injustice that war has to offer. Hedoes this ex tremely successfully as he makes the audience feelencapsulated in the whole experience of war. Even though he is tellingthem what it is like, he leaves freedom for them to develop their own resume on it.Overall, I think that R.C.Sherriff was trying to say that the human array of war is futile. Nobody wins, a lot of people die withoutaccomplishing a great deal, and from whatever angle you chose to lookat it, the whole idea is pointless, causing more pain than isnecessary. Should all this commotion be vital, just to gain anotherthirty metres, which will most probably be return to the rightfulowner in due time in any event?